Trust Calibration
Trust calibration is the core concept behind ATHENA — measuring whether humans have the appropriate level of trust in AI recommendations.
The Problem
When humans work with AI systems, they exhibit predictable trust patterns:
Automation Bias
Blindly following AI recommendations
Errors go undetected
Algorithm Aversion
Ignoring correct AI recommendations
Missed opportunities
EU AI Act Article 14 requires "effective human oversight" — humans must be able to intervene appropriately, neither overtrusting nor undertrusting the AI.
Trust States
ATHENA detects four calibration states:
WELL_CALIBRATED ✅
The user has appropriate trust — following AI when it's correct, overriding when it's wrong.
{
"calibration_category": "WELL_CALIBRATED",
"recommendation": "Continue monitoring. No intervention required."
}OVERTRUSTING ⚠️
The user exhibits automation bias — following AI even when it's incorrect.
UNDERTRUSTING ⚠️
The user exhibits algorithm aversion — rejecting AI even when it's correct.
INCONSISTENT ⚠️
The user shows erratic trust patterns — no consistent relationship between AI accuracy and follow behavior.
How Calibration is Calculated
ATHENA uses a proprietary multi-factor analysis powered by our patent-pending Trust Calibration Engine. The methodology is validated across 390M+ decision records spanning 14 industries.
The Trust Calibration Matrix
The fundamental insight: good calibration means following AI when it's right and overriding when it's wrong.
API Example
What You Get
calibration
Current trust state (4 categories)
trust_score
Numeric score (0-1)
recommendation
Actionable guidance
regulation_mapping
Which regulations apply
Regulation Mapping
EU AI Act Art 14(4)(b)
Detect automation bias
Trust Calibration Engine
Texas TRAIGA § 2056.002
Meaningful human review
Calibration scoring
Colorado AI Act
Impact assessment
Trend analysis
Next: AI Correctness — How ATHENA determines if AI was right
Last updated